Endyigito FMEndyigito FM
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Local News
  • National News
  • International
  • Religion
  • Health
  • Sports
  • Contacts
Notification Show More
Endyigito FMEndyigito FM
Search
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Local News
  • National News
  • International
  • Religion
  • Health
  • Sports
  • Contacts
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2025 Endigyito FM. All Rights Reserved.
National News

High Court Dismisses Eron Kiiza’s Application for Release

Admin
By Admin

The High Court in Kampala has rejected an application by jailed lawyer Eron Kiiza seeking release, citing a Supreme Court ruling that barred the trial of civilians in military courts. Kiiza, a known ally of opposition leader Dr. Kizza Besigye, argued that his continued detention was illegal in light of this recent decision.

Presiding over the case on Monday, Civil Division Judge Dr. Douglas Singiza ruled that Kiiza had filed his application in the wrong court. Since his conviction had already been appealed at the Court Martial Appeals Court, the judge stated that the matter should have been handled there, not in the Civil Division of the High Court.

Dr. Singiza further noted that the proper legal approach would have been a judicial review rather than a habeas corpus application.

“The applicant used an incorrect procedure. The application is hereby dismissed with no order as to costs,” he ruled.

Kiiza’s legal team, led by constitutional law expert Peter Mukidi Walubiri, argued that the Supreme Court’s ruling on the jurisdiction of the General Court Martial invalidated Kiiza’s conviction. They insisted he should either be released unconditionally or, if necessary, face trial in a civilian court.

Walubiri referenced past cases, including those of Dr. Kizza Besigye and Obeid Lutaale, where military court charges were later transferred to civilian courts. He also maintained that the High Court had jurisdiction to hear the matter but claimed procedural barriers prevented them from filing the case in the Criminal Division.

However, Senior State Attorney Johnson Natuhwera, representing the Attorney General, opposed the application, asserting that Kiiza’s conviction remained valid. He argued that the Supreme Court ruling did not abolish the General Court Martial but merely provided guidance on handling future cases.

Natuhwera added that Kiiza’s nine-month sentence had already been upheld by the Supreme Court and that any legal challenge should follow the appropriate legal channels.

Kiiza was convicted by the General Court Martial on January 9, 2025, over his role in representing Besigye and Lutaale in a treason case. Following the High Court’s decision, his legal team is expected to explore alternative legal options.

Share This Article
Facebook Whatsapp Whatsapp LinkedIn
Previous Article Comment les représentations animales façonnent l’imaginaire des joueurs et des créateurs de jeux
Next Article M23 Rebels Surrender FDLR Commander to Rwandan Authorities

Latest News

ARTS TEACHERS GET SALARY INCREMENT IN THE NEW BUDGET AS ECONOMY IS PROJECTED TO GROW TO DOUBLE FIGURES.
National News
TREASON TRIAL OF OPPOSITION VETERAN DR KIIZA BESIGYE AND HIS AIDE, HAJJ OBEID LUTALE, FAILS TO TAKE OFF AS THE TWO ACCUSED PERSONS DID NOT APPEAR IN COURT.
National News Politics
UGANDA SCIENTIFICALLY MARKS 37th HEROES DAY ANNIVERSARY
National News
DR BESIGYE LAWYERS OPPOSES THE COMMENCEMENT OF HIS TRIAL BEFORE DETERMINATION OF PENDING APPLICATIONS
National News Politics
MINISTERS TAKE OATH AS FOUR MISSES OUT
National News Politics
DR. BESIGYE SUES GEN MUHOOZI OVER THREATENING TO HANG HIM
National News Politics
© 2025 Endigyito FM. All Rights Reserved.
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?